Best Known (103, 103+37, s)-Nets in Base 9
(103, 103+37, 804)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (103, 140, 804)-net over F9, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (103, 142, 804)-net over F9, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (13, 32, 64)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 63)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 13 and N(F) ≥ 64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 63)-sequence over F9, using
- digital (71, 110, 740)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (16, 55, 370)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 369)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 16 and N(F) ≥ 370, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 369)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (16, 55, 370)-net over F81, using
- digital (13, 32, 64)-net over F9, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(103, 103+37, 9193)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (103, 140, 9193)-net over F9, using
(103, 103+37, large)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (103, 140, large)-net in base 9, because
- 35 times m-reduction [i] would yield (103, 105, large)-net in base 9, but