Best Known (46, 46+37, s)-Nets in Base 9
(46, 46+37, 300)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (46, 83, 300)-net over F9, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (46, 84, 300)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (4, 42, 150)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 149)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 4 and N(F) ≥ 150, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 149)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (4, 42, 150)-net over F81, using
(46, 46+37, 308)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (46, 83, 308)-net over F9, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (46, 84, 308)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (4, 42, 154)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 153)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 4 and N(F) ≥ 154, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 153)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (4, 42, 154)-net over F81, using
(46, 46+37, 20985)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (46, 83, 20986)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (46, 82, 20986)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 1 770172 203254 207685 008375 562928 927520 477824 724798 720315 517515 575280 061750 368865 > 982 [i]