Best Known (139−38, 139, s)-Nets in Base 9
(139−38, 139, 780)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (101, 139, 780)-net over F9, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (101, 142, 780)-net over F9, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (8, 28, 40)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (8, 39)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 8 and N(F) ≥ 40, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (8, 39)-sequence over F9, using
- digital (73, 114, 740)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (16, 57, 370)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 369)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 16 and N(F) ≥ 370, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 369)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (16, 57, 370)-net over F81, using
- digital (8, 28, 40)-net over F9, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(139−38, 139, 7060)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (101, 139, 7060)-net over F9, using
(139−38, 139, large)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (101, 139, large)-net in base 9, because
- 36 times m-reduction [i] would yield (101, 103, large)-net in base 9, but