Best Known (50, 50+39, s)-Nets in Base 9
(50, 50+39, 320)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (50, 89, 320)-net over F9, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (50, 90, 320)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (5, 45, 160)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 159)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 160, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 159)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (5, 45, 160)-net over F81, using
(50, 50+39, 334)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (50, 89, 334)-net over F9, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (50, 90, 334)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (5, 45, 167)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 166)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 167, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 166)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (5, 45, 167)-net over F81, using
(50, 50+39, 26036)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (50, 89, 26037)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (50, 88, 26037)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 940690 441366 958905 663727 826733 812391 334478 484081 202604 491063 031513 978701 092153 569465 > 988 [i]