Best Known (90, 90+39, s)-Nets in Base 9
(90, 90+39, 750)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (90, 129, 750)-net over F9, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (0, 19, 10)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 9)-sequence over F9, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 10, using
- the rational function field F9(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 9)-sequence over F9, using
- digital (71, 110, 740)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (16, 55, 370)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 369)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 16 and N(F) ≥ 370, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 369)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (16, 55, 370)-net over F81, using
- digital (0, 19, 10)-net over F9, using
(90, 90+39, 3278)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (90, 129, 3278)-net over F9, using
(90, 90+39, 2658916)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (90, 129, 2658917)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (90, 128, 2658917)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 139 008470 922597 173529 734528 714693 973067 459147 074137 475510 771348 350974 993027 418228 622248 947165 341294 032074 352465 640438 771513 > 9128 [i]