Best Known (93, 93+41, s)-Nets in Base 9
(93, 93+41, 750)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (93, 134, 750)-net over F9, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (0, 20, 10)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 9)-sequence over F9, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 10, using
- the rational function field F9(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 9)-sequence over F9, using
- digital (73, 114, 740)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (16, 57, 370)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 369)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 16 and N(F) ≥ 370, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 369)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (16, 57, 370)-net over F81, using
- digital (0, 20, 10)-net over F9, using
(93, 93+41, 3120)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (93, 134, 3120)-net over F9, using
(93, 93+41, 2301053)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (93, 134, 2301054)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (93, 133, 2301054)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 8 208364 465853 925423 754847 844651 759640 285947 064383 457467 231399 051440 940276 482428 114824 313713 872839 450799 642169 219722 347554 889281 > 9133 [i]