Best Known (82−43, 82, s)-Nets in Base 9
(82−43, 82, 96)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (39, 82, 96)-net over F9, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (5, 26, 32)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 31)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 31)-sequence over F9, using
- digital (13, 56, 64)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 63)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 13 and N(F) ≥ 64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 63)-sequence over F9, using
- digital (5, 26, 32)-net over F9, using
(82−43, 82, 140)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (39, 82, 140)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 139)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 39 and N(F) ≥ 140, using
(82−43, 82, 5187)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (39, 82, 5188)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (39, 81, 5188)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 196650 935436 024899 893713 778838 613970 519808 212510 654659 635276 505985 151860 697505 > 981 [i]