Best Known (95−44, 95, s)-Nets in Base 9
(95−44, 95, 232)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (51, 95, 232)-net over F9, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (51, 98, 232)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 49, 116)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 115)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 116, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 115)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 49, 116)-net over F81, using
(95−44, 95, 272)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (51, 95, 272)-net over F9, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (51, 96, 272)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 48, 136)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 135)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 136, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 135)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 48, 136)-net over F81, using
(95−44, 95, 14926)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (51, 95, 14927)-net in base 9, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 4 498667 489304 962915 259632 373409 013432 569174 623064 044369 501742 052615 672660 225718 021315 702865 > 995 [i]