Best Known (100−45, 100, s)-Nets in Base 9
(100−45, 100, 320)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (55, 100, 320)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (5, 50, 160)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 159)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 160, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 159)-sequence over F81, using
(100−45, 100, 334)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (55, 100, 334)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (5, 50, 167)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 166)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 167, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 166)-sequence over F81, using
(100−45, 100, 22263)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (55, 100, 22264)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (55, 99, 22264)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 29523 431803 583700 113042 282518 335801 075208 327603 804425 785106 716433 466129 922911 134347 355909 102465 > 999 [i]