Best Known (145−45, 145, s)-Nets in Base 9
(145−45, 145, 756)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (100, 145, 756)-net over F9, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (1, 23, 16)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 15)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 15)-sequence over F9, using
- digital (77, 122, 740)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (16, 61, 370)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 369)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 16 and N(F) ≥ 370, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 369)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (16, 61, 370)-net over F81, using
- digital (1, 23, 16)-net over F9, using
(145−45, 145, 3031)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (100, 145, 3031)-net over F9, using
(145−45, 145, 1993935)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (100, 145, 1993936)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (100, 144, 1993936)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 257586 638267 461738 202471 557101 939516 558567 908107 230259 221039 972245 702519 092346 273545 683016 560768 978191 285038 651967 144516 163448 460203 255041 > 9144 [i]