Best Known (54, 54+45, s)-Nets in Base 9
(54, 54+45, 300)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (54, 99, 300)-net over F9, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (54, 100, 300)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (4, 50, 150)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 149)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 4 and N(F) ≥ 150, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 149)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (4, 50, 150)-net over F81, using
(54, 54+45, 308)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (54, 99, 308)-net over F9, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (54, 100, 308)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (4, 50, 154)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 153)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 4 and N(F) ≥ 154, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 153)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (4, 50, 154)-net over F81, using
(54, 54+45, 20146)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (54, 99, 20147)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (54, 98, 20147)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 3281 874567 244831 923202 384276 014631 998038 089972 731554 275425 566608 479627 631901 018468 266580 192145 > 998 [i]