Best Known (95, 95+45, s)-Nets in Base 9
(95, 95+45, 740)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (95, 140, 740)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (91, 140, 740)-net over F9, using
- 10 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (91, 150, 740)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (16, 75, 370)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 369)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 16 and N(F) ≥ 370, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 369)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (16, 75, 370)-net over F81, using
- 10 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (91, 150, 740)-net over F9, using
(95, 95+45, 2366)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (95, 140, 2366)-net over F9, using
(95, 95+45, 1210140)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (95, 140, 1210141)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (95, 139, 1210141)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 4 362236 316227 208222 578326 305263 303309 313065 737899 514094 448502 439372 828089 109797 376376 357746 378287 668956 949942 114913 656385 709837 016369 > 9139 [i]