Best Known (96, 96+45, s)-Nets in Base 9
(96, 96+45, 740)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (96, 141, 740)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (91, 141, 740)-net over F9, using
- 9 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (91, 150, 740)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (16, 75, 370)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 369)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 16 and N(F) ≥ 370, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 369)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (16, 75, 370)-net over F81, using
- 9 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (91, 150, 740)-net over F9, using
(96, 96+45, 2487)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (96, 141, 2487)-net over F9, using
(96, 96+45, 1337245)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (96, 141, 1337246)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (96, 140, 1337246)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 39 260565 918110 219938 339225 558113 119206 362944 935463 077588 402258 398281 767548 999117 774364 801336 710503 819545 434506 251284 844987 553456 321121 > 9140 [i]