Best Known (99, 99+45, s)-Nets in Base 9
(99, 99+45, 750)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (99, 144, 750)-net over F9, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (0, 22, 10)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 9)-sequence over F9, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 10, using
- the rational function field F9(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 9)-sequence over F9, using
- digital (77, 122, 740)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (16, 61, 370)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 369)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 16 and N(F) ≥ 370, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 369)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (16, 61, 370)-net over F81, using
- digital (0, 22, 10)-net over F9, using
(99, 99+45, 2885)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (99, 144, 2885)-net over F9, using
(99, 99+45, 1804413)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (99, 144, 1804414)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (99, 143, 1804414)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 28620 645007 559347 969166 364932 541645 044793 140809 889207 853379 969597 641783 608397 877250 229471 524722 334241 751687 155823 674598 193678 423014 228065 > 9143 [i]