Best Known (64, 64+46, s)-Nets in Base 9
(64, 64+46, 344)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (64, 110, 344)-net over F9, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (64, 114, 344)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 57, 172)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 171)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 172, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 171)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 57, 172)-net over F81, using
(64, 64+46, 488)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (64, 110, 488)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (9, 55, 244)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 243)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 244, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 243)-sequence over F81, using
(64, 64+46, 43151)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (64, 110, 43152)-net in base 9, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 926 419281 283685 753057 194035 074394 856928 567567 010305 385121 159387 240112 406732 513991 239148 037792 679992 127873 > 9110 [i]