Best Known (100−47, 100, s)-Nets in Base 9
(100−47, 100, 232)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (53, 100, 232)-net over F9, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (53, 102, 232)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 51, 116)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 115)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 116, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 115)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 51, 116)-net over F81, using
(100−47, 100, 272)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (53, 100, 272)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 50, 136)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 135)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 136, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 135)-sequence over F81, using
(100−47, 100, 15078)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (53, 100, 15079)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (53, 99, 15079)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 29534 401757 435459 720789 091581 902684 602659 219486 436772 299557 541323 175352 246537 655717 472706 645257 > 999 [i]