Best Known (54, 54+47, s)-Nets in Base 9
(54, 54+47, 232)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (54, 101, 232)-net over F9, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (54, 104, 232)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 52, 116)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 115)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 116, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 115)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 52, 116)-net over F81, using
(54, 54+47, 272)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (54, 101, 272)-net over F9, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (54, 102, 272)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 51, 136)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 135)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 136, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 135)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 51, 136)-net over F81, using
(54, 54+47, 16591)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (54, 101, 16592)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (54, 100, 16592)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 265823 743732 821405 107602 111578 959720 583250 680717 495499 194797 599288 328353 748041 300126 227815 286657 > 9100 [i]