Best Known (54, 54+48, s)-Nets in Base 9
(54, 54+48, 232)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (54, 102, 232)-net over F9, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (54, 104, 232)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 52, 116)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 115)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 116, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 115)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 52, 116)-net over F81, using
(54, 54+48, 272)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (54, 102, 272)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 51, 136)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 135)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 136, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 135)-sequence over F81, using
(54, 54+48, 13910)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (54, 102, 13911)-net in base 9, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 21 523346 039013 265381 305622 591374 733769 362466 197783 432342 213630 052635 859892 963845 173277 160647 624001 > 9102 [i]