Best Known (86−51, 86, s)-Nets in Base 9
(86−51, 86, 81)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (35, 86, 81)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (32, 86, 81)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- F4 from the tower of function fields by Bezerra and GarcÃa over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
(86−51, 86, 128)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (35, 86, 128)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (33, 86, 128)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 127)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 127)-sequence over F9, using
(86−51, 86, 2218)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (35, 86, 2219)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (35, 85, 2219)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 1300 597062 202270 223883 241641 949860 761552 102934 495901 266626 351147 247161 378256 280473 > 985 [i]