Best Known (94−51, 94, s)-Nets in Base 9
(94−51, 94, 96)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (43, 94, 96)-net over F9, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (5, 30, 32)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 31)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 31)-sequence over F9, using
- digital (13, 64, 64)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 63)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 13 and N(F) ≥ 64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 63)-sequence over F9, using
- digital (5, 30, 32)-net over F9, using
(94−51, 94, 147)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (43, 94, 147)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (43, 146)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 43 and N(F) ≥ 147, using
(94−51, 94, 4496)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (43, 94, 4497)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (43, 93, 4497)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 55730 859549 042452 944472 153921 213267 172067 621890 333626 245393 339913 464962 552981 127969 645641 > 993 [i]