Best Known (34, 34+51, s)-Nets in Base 9
(34, 34+51, 81)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (34, 85, 81)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (32, 85, 81)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- F4 from the tower of function fields by Bezerra and GarcÃa over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
(34, 34+51, 128)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (34, 85, 128)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (33, 85, 128)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 127)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 127)-sequence over F9, using
(34, 34+51, 2030)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (34, 85, 2031)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (34, 84, 2031)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 144 454711 068873 613443 028103 028404 041146 941183 884644 906887 094398 463702 598804 490937 > 984 [i]