Best Known (100−52, 100, s)-Nets in Base 9
(100−52, 100, 106)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (48, 100, 106)-net over F9, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (5, 31, 32)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 31)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 31)-sequence over F9, using
- digital (17, 69, 74)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 17 and N(F) ≥ 74, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- digital (5, 31, 32)-net over F9, using
(100−52, 100, 167)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (48, 100, 167)-net over F9, using
(100−52, 100, 6155)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (48, 100, 6156)-net in base 9, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 266265 709088 110161 412031 057730 588963 142306 700786 188567 640188 329016 499787 460442 063878 981834 435393 > 9100 [i]