Best Known (116−52, 116, s)-Nets in Base 9
(116−52, 116, 320)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (64, 116, 320)-net over F9, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (64, 118, 320)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (5, 59, 160)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 159)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 160, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 159)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (5, 59, 160)-net over F81, using
(116−52, 116, 380)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (64, 116, 380)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 58, 190)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 189)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 190, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 189)-sequence over F81, using
(116−52, 116, 23839)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (64, 116, 23840)-net in base 9, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 492 197175 684925 531155 989828 399121 171052 573882 119327 052500 159828 008173 994779 586559 859015 469092 356765 770608 696833 > 9116 [i]