Best Known (58, 58+52, s)-Nets in Base 9
(58, 58+52, 232)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (58, 110, 232)-net over F9, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (58, 112, 232)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 56, 116)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 115)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 116, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 115)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 56, 116)-net over F81, using
(58, 58+52, 272)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (58, 110, 272)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 55, 136)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 135)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 136, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 135)-sequence over F81, using
(58, 58+52, 14351)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (58, 110, 14352)-net in base 9, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 926 455207 492361 293379 697819 138487 528124 689234 420135 973183 881673 064366 305829 849075 734063 441435 496961 554177 > 9110 [i]