Best Known (104−54, 104, s)-Nets in Base 9
(104−54, 104, 108)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (50, 104, 108)-net over F9, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (6, 33, 34)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 33)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 34, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 33)-sequence over F9, using
- digital (17, 71, 74)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 17 and N(F) ≥ 74, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- digital (6, 33, 34)-net over F9, using
(104−54, 104, 182)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (50, 104, 182)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (50, 181)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 50 and N(F) ≥ 182, using
(104−54, 104, 6453)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (50, 104, 6454)-net in base 9, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 1743 892667 326726 233144 819528 982746 398083 798376 731883 194877 513440 628924 106153 396604 762191 023344 106065 > 9104 [i]