Best Known (95, 95+54, s)-Nets in Base 9
(95, 95+54, 740)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (95, 149, 740)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (91, 149, 740)-net over F9, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (91, 150, 740)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (16, 75, 370)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 369)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 16 and N(F) ≥ 370, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 369)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (16, 75, 370)-net over F81, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (91, 150, 740)-net over F9, using
(95, 95+54, 1266)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (95, 149, 1266)-net over F9, using
(95, 95+54, 251937)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (95, 149, 251938)-net in base 9, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 15210 316461 231291 058773 671980 861540 320902 931746 651068 089352 381877 739635 844483 963948 745948 491970 824474 676856 334317 267506 002301 870111 958120 191985 > 9149 [i]