Best Known (109−55, 109, s)-Nets in Base 9
(109−55, 109, 128)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (54, 109, 128)-net over F9, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (54, 110, 128)-net over F9, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (13, 41, 64)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 63)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 13 and N(F) ≥ 64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 63)-sequence over F9, using
- digital (13, 69, 64)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 63)-sequence over F9 (see above)
- digital (13, 41, 64)-net over F9, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(109−55, 109, 204)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (54, 109, 204)-net over F9, using
(109−55, 109, 8943)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (54, 109, 8944)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (54, 108, 8944)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 11 461520 625487 121342 594961 073611 240890 187783 471722 372178 815001 089157 877227 873826 758740 673263 540803 460225 > 9108 [i]