Best Known (128−55, 128, s)-Nets in Base 9
(128−55, 128, 344)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (73, 128, 344)-net over F9, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (73, 132, 344)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 66, 172)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 171)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 172, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 171)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 66, 172)-net over F81, using
(128−55, 128, 488)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (73, 128, 488)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (9, 64, 244)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 243)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 244, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 243)-sequence over F81, using
(128−55, 128, 42036)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (73, 128, 42037)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (73, 127, 42037)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 15 455015 282880 221236 451596 679251 387732 663576 348278 317444 573485 454592 267875 291538 172465 629464 705962 712592 579867 361205 226745 > 9127 [i]