MinT - Best Known (39, 39+55, s)-Nets in Base 9

Best Known (39, 39+55, s)-Nets in Base 9

(39, 39+55, 81)-Net over F₉ — Constructive and digital

Digital (39, 94, 81)-net over F₉, using

t-expansion [i] based on digital (32, 94, 81)-net over F₉, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F₉, using
  - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₉ with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
    - F₄ from the tower of function fields by Bezerra and GarcÃa over F₉ [i]

(39, 39+55, 82)-Net in Base 9 — Constructive

(39, 94, 82)-net in base 9, using

2 times m-reduction [i] based on (39, 96, 82)-net in base 9, using
- base change [i] based on digital (7, 64, 82)-net over F₂₇, using
  - net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 81)-sequence over F₂₇, using
    - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₂₇ with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 82, using
      - a function field by SÃ©mirat [i]

(39, 39+55, 140)-Net over F₉ — Digital

Digital (39, 94, 140)-net over F₉, using

net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 139)-sequence over F₉, using
- Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₉ with g(F) = 39 and N(F) ≥ 140, using
  - a curve from the manYPoints database [i]

(39, 39+55, 2626)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s

There is no (39, 94, 2627)-net in base 9, because

1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (39, 93, 2627)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9^mÂ â‰¥ 55539 307188 930837 423717 871795 707332 276707 597132 185229 742494 966614 584776 090916 570961 257225 > 9⁹³ [i]