Best Known (93, 93+55, s)-Nets in Base 9
(93, 93+55, 740)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (93, 148, 740)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (91, 148, 740)-net over F9, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (91, 150, 740)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (16, 75, 370)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 369)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 16 and N(F) ≥ 370, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 369)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (16, 75, 370)-net over F81, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (91, 150, 740)-net over F9, using
(93, 93+55, 1108)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (93, 148, 1108)-net over F9, using
(93, 93+55, 214093)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (93, 148, 214094)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (93, 147, 214094)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 187 786801 371728 990652 459770 095889 035972 385724 498572 446252 934507 709518 330004 697550 665607 001486 224160 216266 049950 371034 078009 339666 805810 272145 > 9147 [i]