Best Known (39, 39+59, s)-Nets in Base 9
(39, 39+59, 81)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (39, 98, 81)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (32, 98, 81)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- F4 from the tower of function fields by Bezerra and GarcÃa over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
(39, 39+59, 140)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (39, 98, 140)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 139)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 39 and N(F) ≥ 140, using
(39, 39+59, 2251)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (39, 98, 2252)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (39, 97, 2252)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 367 718439 151795 364575 832405 902000 692036 942880 075515 663033 516284 207688 690260 728560 282231 158241 > 997 [i]