Best Known (50, 50+59, s)-Nets in Base 9
(50, 50+59, 104)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (50, 109, 104)-net over F9, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (8, 37, 40)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (8, 39)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 8 and N(F) ≥ 40, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (8, 39)-sequence over F9, using
- digital (13, 72, 64)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 63)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 13 and N(F) ≥ 64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 63)-sequence over F9, using
- digital (8, 37, 40)-net over F9, using
(50, 50+59, 182)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (50, 109, 182)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (50, 181)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 50 and N(F) ≥ 182, using
(50, 50+59, 5203)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (50, 109, 5204)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (50, 108, 5204)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 11 465500 289863 399149 800885 557015 691828 225921 733642 821695 730981 656655 462112 457982 136072 736445 260277 554977 > 9108 [i]