Best Known (90, 90+59, s)-Nets in Base 9
(90, 90+59, 448)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (90, 149, 448)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (88, 149, 448)-net over F9, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (88, 150, 448)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (13, 75, 224)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 223)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 13 and N(F) ≥ 224, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 223)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (13, 75, 224)-net over F81, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (88, 150, 448)-net over F9, using
(90, 90+59, 799)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (90, 149, 799)-net over F9, using
(90, 90+59, 108115)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (90, 149, 108116)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (90, 148, 108116)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 1690 179415 512860 049753 553034 404605 994265 831434 633220 940895 459761 441840 102671 315143 348868 693974 433860 593562 140612 218367 738551 258708 867865 308961 > 9148 [i]