Best Known (109−60, 109, s)-Nets in Base 9
(109−60, 109, 98)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (49, 109, 98)-net over F9, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (6, 36, 34)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 33)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 34, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 33)-sequence over F9, using
- digital (13, 73, 64)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 63)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 13 and N(F) ≥ 64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 63)-sequence over F9, using
- digital (6, 36, 34)-net over F9, using
(109−60, 109, 168)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (49, 109, 168)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (49, 167)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 49 and N(F) ≥ 168, using
(109−60, 109, 4395)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (49, 109, 4396)-net in base 9, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 103 438321 510365 666981 832310 186409 764423 052945 519018 844762 308680 815250 269666 318408 694325 655957 122765 699009 > 9109 [i]