Best Known (89−61, 89, s)-Nets in Base 9
(89−61, 89, 78)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (28, 89, 78)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (22, 89, 78)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- F3 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
(89−61, 89, 110)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (28, 89, 110)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (26, 89, 110)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (26, 109)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 26 and N(F) ≥ 110, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (26, 109)-sequence over F9, using
(89−61, 89, 929)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (28, 89, 930)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (28, 88, 930)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 944727 259159 277651 734661 833117 851686 629793 340994 234339 121038 322697 519659 875218 565665 > 988 [i]