Best Known (56, 56+62, s)-Nets in Base 9
(56, 56+62, 114)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (56, 118, 114)-net over F9, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (8, 39, 40)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (8, 39)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 8 and N(F) ≥ 40, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (8, 39)-sequence over F9, using
- digital (17, 79, 74)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 17 and N(F) ≥ 74, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- digital (8, 39, 40)-net over F9, using
(56, 56+62, 185)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (56, 118, 185)-net over F9, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OOA(9118, 185, F9, 3, 62) (dual of [(185, 3), 437, 63]-NRT-code), using
- construction X applied to AG(3;F,480P) ⊂ AG(3;F,487P) [i] based on
- linear OOA(9112, 181, F9, 3, 62) (dual of [(181, 3), 431, 63]-NRT-code), using algebraic-geometric NRT-code AG(3;F,480P) [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 50 and N(F) ≥ 182, using
- linear OOA(9105, 181, F9, 3, 55) (dual of [(181, 3), 438, 56]-NRT-code), using algebraic-geometric NRT-code AG(3;F,487P) [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 50 and N(F) ≥ 182 (see above)
- linear OOA(96, 4, F9, 3, 6) (dual of [(4, 3), 6, 7]-NRT-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OOA(96, 9, F9, 3, 6) (dual of [(9, 3), 21, 7]-NRT-code), using
- Reed–Solomon NRT-code RS(3;21,9) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OOA(96, 9, F9, 3, 6) (dual of [(9, 3), 21, 7]-NRT-code), using
- construction X applied to AG(3;F,480P) ⊂ AG(3;F,487P) [i] based on
(56, 56+62, 6637)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (56, 118, 6638)-net in base 9, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 40005 371505 398184 390224 473870 078711 060400 128182 936237 827450 350853 088548 810015 220649 600957 321895 984734 030325 774545 > 9118 [i]