Best Known (79, 79+63, s)-Nets in Base 9
(79, 79+63, 344)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (79, 142, 344)-net over F9, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (79, 144, 344)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 72, 172)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 171)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 172, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 171)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 72, 172)-net over F81, using
(79, 79+63, 452)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (79, 142, 452)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (8, 71, 226)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (8, 225)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 8 and N(F) ≥ 226, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (8, 225)-sequence over F81, using
(79, 79+63, 33959)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (79, 142, 33960)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (79, 141, 33960)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 353 382850 104840 332841 945657 257108 320264 227389 874922 974752 446488 848539 649255 294543 601347 567116 169935 060452 929190 601015 533875 325301 284801 > 9141 [i]