Best Known (105−64, 105, s)-Nets in Base 9
(105−64, 105, 81)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (41, 105, 81)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (32, 105, 81)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- F4 from the tower of function fields by Bezerra and GarcÃa over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
(105−64, 105, 140)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (41, 105, 140)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (39, 105, 140)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 139)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 39 and N(F) ≥ 140, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 139)-sequence over F9, using
(105−64, 105, 2142)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (41, 105, 2143)-net in base 9, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 15738 769388 970940 405304 738177 275355 474036 028468 842314 970091 054138 744577 785966 697634 799085 190919 560961 > 9105 [i]