Best Known (40, 40+64, s)-Nets in Base 9
(40, 40+64, 81)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (40, 104, 81)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (32, 104, 81)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- F4 from the tower of function fields by Bezerra and GarcÃa over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
(40, 40+64, 140)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (40, 104, 140)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (39, 104, 140)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 139)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 39 and N(F) ≥ 140, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 139)-sequence over F9, using
(40, 40+64, 1999)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (40, 104, 2000)-net in base 9, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 1762 502707 144143 091064 084117 761372 950498 940257 081530 641570 919358 505632 202876 202654 156709 500192 829441 > 9104 [i]