Best Known (104−65, 104, s)-Nets in Base 9
(104−65, 104, 81)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (39, 104, 81)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (32, 104, 81)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- F4 from the tower of function fields by Bezerra and GarcÃa over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
(104−65, 104, 140)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (39, 104, 140)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 139)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 39 and N(F) ≥ 140, using
(104−65, 104, 1865)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (39, 104, 1866)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (39, 103, 1866)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 195 848159 042210 647318 574367 195120 685224 777687 227194 476446 756508 657701 834511 937909 369937 229671 624193 > 9103 [i]