Best Known (27, 27+65, s)-Nets in Base 9
(27, 27+65, 78)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (27, 92, 78)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (22, 92, 78)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- F3 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
(27, 27+65, 110)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (27, 92, 110)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (26, 92, 110)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (26, 109)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 26 and N(F) ≥ 110, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (26, 109)-sequence over F9, using
(27, 27+65, 807)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (27, 92, 808)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (27, 91, 808)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 699 880057 629345 895991 896047 434643 526145 969495 522251 615572 857493 575103 367642 431323 592705 > 991 [i]