Best Known (33, 33+65, s)-Nets in Base 9
(33, 33+65, 81)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (33, 98, 81)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (32, 98, 81)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- F4 from the tower of function fields by Bezerra and GarcÃa over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
(33, 33+65, 128)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (33, 98, 128)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 127)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 128, using
(33, 33+65, 1228)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (33, 98, 1229)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (33, 97, 1229)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 364 876136 153078 989423 216244 127328 792589 565550 353855 129513 580876 229138 069956 146300 137627 558145 > 997 [i]