Best Known (129−66, 129, s)-Nets in Base 9
(129−66, 129, 138)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (63, 129, 138)-net over F9, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (13, 46, 64)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 63)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 13 and N(F) ≥ 64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 63)-sequence over F9, using
- digital (17, 83, 74)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 17 and N(F) ≥ 74, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- digital (13, 46, 64)-net over F9, using
(129−66, 129, 221)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (63, 129, 221)-net over F9, using
(129−66, 129, 8820)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (63, 129, 8821)-net in base 9, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 1253 171463 103993 985650 842111 716528 050691 301619 861852 308136 733889 522653 193644 695289 225966 432555 706437 592639 614505 373350 020265 > 9129 [i]