Best Known (89−66, 89, s)-Nets in Base 9
(89−66, 89, 78)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (23, 89, 78)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (22, 89, 78)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- F3 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
(89−66, 89, 92)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (23, 89, 92)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (23, 91)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 23 and N(F) ≥ 92, using
(89−66, 89, 596)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (23, 89, 597)-net in base 9, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 8 732773 817052 160511 474551 990226 230515 710676 700765 332149 108399 731689 536313 622290 686889 > 989 [i]