Best Known (103−67, 103, s)-Nets in Base 9
(103−67, 103, 81)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (36, 103, 81)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (32, 103, 81)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- F4 from the tower of function fields by Bezerra and GarcÃa over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
(103−67, 103, 128)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (36, 103, 128)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (33, 103, 128)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 127)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 127)-sequence over F9, using
(103−67, 103, 1444)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (36, 103, 1445)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (36, 102, 1445)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 21 694724 706556 578909 231370 319938 550730 230825 520216 001660 133308 161594 012760 811912 971947 690789 973545 > 9102 [i]