Best Known (29, 29+67, s)-Nets in Base 9
(29, 29+67, 78)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (29, 96, 78)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (22, 96, 78)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- F3 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
(29, 29+67, 110)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (29, 96, 110)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (26, 96, 110)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (26, 109)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 26 and N(F) ≥ 110, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (26, 109)-sequence over F9, using
(29, 29+67, 899)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (29, 96, 900)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (29, 95, 900)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 4 658240 308545 772081 373197 881904 860932 019325 694510 631008 924285 292780 075231 458448 064634 996769 > 995 [i]