Best Known (65, 65+67, s)-Nets in Base 9
(65, 65+67, 165)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (65, 132, 165)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (64, 132, 165)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (64, 164)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 64 and N(F) ≥ 165, using
- T4 from the second tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 64 and N(F) ≥ 165, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (64, 164)-sequence over F9, using
(65, 65+67, 233)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (65, 132, 233)-net over F9, using
(65, 65+67, 10079)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (65, 132, 10080)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (65, 131, 10080)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 101402 766405 306815 371650 914447 050013 128954 323067 312620 692842 587177 995568 066981 953921 806513 572901 315786 678362 741864 572482 706177 > 9131 [i]