Best Known (94−69, 94, s)-Nets in Base 9
(94−69, 94, 78)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (25, 94, 78)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (22, 94, 78)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- F3 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
(94−69, 94, 96)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (25, 94, 96)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (25, 95)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 25 and N(F) ≥ 96, using
(94−69, 94, 668)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (25, 94, 669)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (25, 93, 669)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 55784 746306 680949 981643 222731 485575 278959 046296 003356 281167 937721 432320 206336 282283 591569 > 993 [i]