Best Known (110−71, 110, s)-Nets in Base 9
(110−71, 110, 81)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (39, 110, 81)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (32, 110, 81)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- F4 from the tower of function fields by Bezerra and GarcÃa over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
(110−71, 110, 140)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (39, 110, 140)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 139)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 39 and N(F) ≥ 140, using
(110−71, 110, 1607)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (39, 110, 1608)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (39, 109, 1608)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 103 249147 567059 386297 892466 081818 635964 894651 322340 923480 738315 417235 571512 287437 950474 773297 758682 649025 > 9109 [i]