Best Known (132−71, 132, s)-Nets in Base 9
(132−71, 132, 128)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (61, 132, 128)-net over F9, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (13, 48, 64)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 63)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 13 and N(F) ≥ 64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 63)-sequence over F9, using
- digital (13, 84, 64)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 63)-sequence over F9 (see above)
- digital (13, 48, 64)-net over F9, using
(132−71, 132, 192)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (61, 132, 192)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (61, 191)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 61 and N(F) ≥ 192, using
(132−71, 132, 6461)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (61, 132, 6462)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (61, 131, 6462)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 101603 397699 155095 560250 913893 438105 770505 976269 515150 248703 673563 398291 895567 091509 600902 921557 193263 018294 871446 794009 299089 > 9131 [i]